Archbee vs. Leed
Archbee covers a lot of ground — multiplayer editing, Git sync, a review workflow, and a native MCP server. But AI writing and search analytics are paid add-ons, analytics is gated to the $350/mo Scaling tier, and lead-gen is a generic third-party embed. Leed includes release-note automation, reader analytics, and native lead capture — free to start with unlimited users.
You want an all-in-one docs platform with real-time editing and Git sync and you're comfortable paying extra for AI writing and search analytics as add-ons.
You want the growth engine included, not gated or bolted on — release-note automation, reader analytics, and native lead capture, free to start with unlimited users and no $350/mo tier or add-ons.
Where the platforms diverge.
The growth engine Archbee gates or bolts on.
The growth engine included — not a $350 add-on
Archbee's search analytics is aggregate keyword data gated to its $350/mo Scaling tier, and AI writing is a paid add-on. Leed includes reader analytics and AI authoring on every plan, free to start.
Analytics tied to the reader
Archbee's analytics is aggregate keyword data. Leed's scroll-depth and reader-identification analytics tell you who engaged, not just which terms were searched.
Lead capture that's actually native
Archbee's lead-gen is a generic third-party form embed. Leed's lead capture and nurturing are native to the page, feeding a closed per-reader funnel.
Start free. See what your docs are worth.
Bring your existing docs — unlimited users, your own domain, no card. Capture leads free; pay only when you're ready to email and nurture them.