Document360 vs. Leed
Document360's Eddy AI is a genuinely capable writing assistant, and its MCP server is one of the more mature implementations in the category. But it locks each article to a single editor at a time, its analytics stop at aggregate counts, and there's no native lead capture. Leed adds true simultaneous co-editing, reader-level analytics, and lead-gen — free to start with unlimited users.
You want a mature AI writing suite and knowledge-base workflow with strong versioning, RBAC, and an established MCP integration.
You want co-editing and a growth engine, free to start — simultaneous editing, reader-level analytics, and lead capture, with unlimited users and no per-account bill.
Where the platforms diverge.
The growth engine Document360 locks up.
One editor at a time, or all of them at once
Document360 locks an article to a single editor; teammates wait or work around it with private notes. Leed's multi-cursor editing lets the whole team work the same page simultaneously.
Analytics that identify the reader
Document360's own docs confirm article analytics report aggregate counts, not individual identity. Leed's scroll-depth and click tracking tells you who engaged.
Docs that capture pipeline
Document360 has no native lead-gen — teams embed a third-party form via iframe. Leed's lead capture and nurturing are built into the page, feeding a closed per-reader funnel.
Start free. See what your docs are worth.
Bring your existing docs — unlimited users, your own domain, no card. Capture leads free; pay only when you're ready to email and nurture them.